The 2020 Inducement Plan is used exclusively for the grant of equity awards to individuals who were not previously an employee or non-employee director of Blueprint Medicines, as an inducement material to such individual's entering into employment with Blueprint Medicines, pursuant to Rule 5635(c)(4) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules.
6, 2022 /PRNewswire/ - Blueprint Medicines Corporation (Nasdaq: BPMC), a precision therapy company focused on genomically defined cancers, rare diseases and cancer immunotherapy, today announced that, effective October 1, 2022, the Compensation Committee of Blueprint Medicines' Board of Directors granted non-qualified stock options to purchase an aggregate of 11,381 shares of its common stock and an aggregate of 5,688 restricted stock units (RSUs) to eight new employees under Blueprint Medicines' 2020 Inducement Plan. Some MEPs argue predictive policing should be forbidden because it “violates the presumption of innocence as well as human dignity.” Late last week, the EU's executive branch, the European Commission, proposed a new law that allow people treated unfairly by AI to file lawsuits in civil court.CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Oct.
#Blueprint art how to
Members of the European Parliament are considering how to amend the AI Act and decide which forms of AI should require public disclosure or be banned outright. The limited bite of the White House’s AI Bill of Rights stands in contrast to more toothy AI regulation currently under development in the European Union. The Department of Education plans to release recommendations on the use of AI for teaching or learning by early 2023. Some algorithms used to prioritize access to care and guide individual treatments have been found to be biased against marginalized groups. The Department of Health and Human Services will release a plan for reducing algorithmic discrimination in health care by the end of the year. The White House also announced actions by federal agencies today to curtail harmful AI. When asked why the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights does not include mention of bans as an option to control AI harms, a senior administration official said the focus of it is to shield people from tech that threatens their rights and opportunities, not to call for the prohibition of any type of technology. Zimmerman would also like to see enforceable legal frameworks that can hold people and companies accountable for designing or deploying harmful AI. “We can’t articulate a bill of rights without considering non-deployment, the most rights-protecting option,” she says. “This is the White House saying that workers, students, consumers, communities, everyone in this country should expect and demand better from our technologies.”Īnnette Zimmermann, who researches AI, justice, and moral philosophy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, says she’s impressed with the five focal points chosen for the AI Bill of Rights, and that it has the potential to push AI policy and regulation in the right direction over time.īut she believes the blueprint shies away from acknowledging that in some cases rectifying injustice can require not using AI at all. “Technologies will come and go, but foundational liberties, rights, opportunities, and access need to be held open, and it’s the government’s job to help ensure that’s the case,” Alondra Nelson, OSTP deputy director for science and society, told WIRED.
#Blueprint art free
Its five principles state that people have a right to control how their data is used, to opt out of automated decisionmaking, to live free from ineffective or unsafe algorithms, to know when AI is making a decision about them, and to not be discriminated against by unfair algorithms.
Today, the OSTP released the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights, after gathering input from companies like Microsoft and Palantir as well as AI auditing startups, human rights groups, and the general public. Harms from artificial intelligence disproportionately impact marginalized communities, the office’s director and deputy director wrote in a WIRED op-ed, and so government guidance was needed to protect people against discriminatory or ineffective AI. Last year, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) announced that the US needed a bill of rights for the age of algorithms.
0 kommentar(er)
